The best casino in Sydney for 2026: the honest answer is a building, not a website

Anyone searching for the best casino in Sydney in 2026 is, by definition, looking at a market where two of the answers a comparable search would return overseas simply do not exist. Sydney has no licensed online casino. No state or territory in Australia issues a licence for one. The Interactive Gambling Act 2001 makes the offering of online casino games, online pokies and in-play betting to a person physically in Australia a civil offence, and the Australian Communications and Media Authority spends its working year proving that the prohibition has teeth. The “best casino in Sydney” question, then, has a different shape here than in London or Toronto. It is a question about two physical buildings on the harbour — The Star Sydney in Pyrmont and Crown Sydney at Barangaroo — and about the long, growing list of offshore sites the ACMA has told to stop marketing themselves to Australians.

A person at a kitchen table scrolling through review pages on a laptop, phone face-down beside them.
The ACMA issued further formal warnings in March 2025 over Woo Casino and in May 2025 over Spirit Casino, both operated by Dama N.V.

This page works through both halves. It covers Sydney’s two licensed casino properties, the games on their floors, the surrounding hotels, the age limit and the responsible-gaming supports a visitor actually uses. It lays out the ACMA’s enforcement record against offshore operators who have ignored the Interactive Gambling Act and tried to take Australian deposits anyway — eleven of them, named and dated. And it closes with the responsible-gaming tools that do reach an Australian player, because the offshore sites the ACMA blocks do not.

Data current as of 29 October 2026; licence claims and ACMA actions checked against the Australian Communications and Media Authority register and Liquor and Gaming NSW public notices.

Table of Contents
  1. The legal floor under any answer to this question
  2. Responsible gaming and the safety net that actually reaches an Australian player
  3. Sydney’s two licensed casino properties
  4. The gaming floor at each venue
  5. The offshore operators the ACMA has named
  6. Landscape of ACMA-warned operators
  7. The blocking rate: how fast the ACMA is removing offshore sites
  8. The fundamentals for a visitor choosing between the two venues
  9. FAQ

What the Interactive Gambling Act actually prohibits

The IGA, in the form the Interactive Gambling Amendment Act 2017 left it, prohibits the supply of a “prohibited interactive gambling service” to a person in Australia. The prohibited services are online casino games — roulette, blackjack, baccarat, craps, slots and the rest of it — and online pokies. In-play betting on a sport event after it has started is prohibited too. What is permitted is wagering on a race or sporting event placed before the event, lotteries, and keno. In practice, the licensed online wagering market — Sportsbet, Bet365, Ladbrokes and the rest — runs out of the Northern Territory under Racing and Wagering Act licences issued by the Northern Territory Racing and Wagering Commission, a body with no full-time staff that meets monthly in Darwin.

The IGA targets the provider, not the player. An Australian punter who opens an account at an offshore casino is not committing an offence. The operator is, every day it keeps accepting Australian deposits. That is the lever the ACMA uses.

How the ACMA enforces it

The ACMA’s two tools are the formal warning and the blocking request. A formal warning is a published letter to an operator identifying the specific Australian-facing conduct the ACMA objects to, naming the brand, the URL and the controlling entity. It is the regulator putting a dated, public mark on the file. A blocking request goes to Australian internet service providers and asks them to make the named domains unresolvable from Australian IP addresses. It is not a court order and a determined user with a VPN can route around it; it is, however, the closest thing to a switch-off that the regulator can throw.

By the ACMA’s own June 2026 update, 1,751 illegal gambling and affiliate marketing websites had been blocked since the regulator issued its first blocking request in November 2019, and more than 230 unlicensed gambling services had withdrawn from the Australian market since enforcement was strengthened in 2017. The most recent round, reported on 26 June 2026, blocked twelve names in one batch: 7Signs, ChromaBet, Donbet, Duospin, Freshbet, Slots Gem, Jacks Club, Lucky Start, Pointsbetz, Spinrise, Vinyl Casino and Wildsino. The pace has not slowed; it has accelerated.

H2 Gambling Capital’s 2025 estimate puts annual losses to illegal gambling sites at roughly A$3.9 billion, and the share of gambling going through legal channels fell from 74 per cent in 2021 to 64 per cent in 2025. That is the market the offshore operators are chasing, and the cost the IGA is trying to keep inside Australian regulation.

The “fundamenta” of offshore access from Australia

The structural fact that any offshore casino marketing to Australians depends on is that the operator does not need to be in Australia to take a deposit. Credit cards and credit-related products have been banned as payment for licensed online wagering since 11 June 2024, with penalties for breaching operators reaching A$247,500 — a measure aimed at the Australian-licensed side of the market. Offshore sites simply ignore that rule. They take credit cards, they take crypto, they route through payment intermediaries in jurisdictions that have not signed the Australian ePayments Code. The IGA gives the ACMA no power over a Curaçao or Anjouan-incorporated company that has no Australian subsidiary. It gives the ACMA the power to block the URL, the power to publish the warning, and the power to refer the matter to the Australian Federal Police for criminal investigation under the worst cases.

What it does not give the ACMA is the power to recover a balance. An Australian who deposited with an offshore site, played through the bonus terms and asked for a withdrawal that the operator refused has, in practical terms, no Australian complaints mechanism to appeal to. The offshore regulator — Curaçao, Anjouan, Costa Rica, occasionally the Kahnawake Gaming Commission — has its own dispute process, but the leverage it has over its own licensee is the leverage of licence renewal, not the leverage of an Australian court order. That asymmetry is the fundamental cost of using an offshore casino from Australia, and it is the cost the rest of this page keeps coming back to.

The 2026 reform sitting in the wings

The Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026 passed Parliament on 19 August 2026, and its advertising and inducement measures commence on 1 January 2027. The bill tightens the rules around how licensed wagering services market to Australians; it does not, in its published form, change the underlying prohibition on online casino. As of 2026 the prohibition stands, and as of 1 January 2027 the marketing will be policed more aggressively. The law has a start date. The start date is not today.

Responsible gaming and the safety net that actually reaches an Australian player

Age, identification and the entry floor

The legal age to enter a casino floor in New South Wales is 18, and the entry floor at The Star Sydney and Crown Sydney is enforced at the door. Both venues require photo identification — a current driver’s licence, a current passport or a NSW Photo Card — and the casino operator runs the entrant against the NSW casino exclusion register as a matter of course. Crown Sydney, as the newer of the two, is fully cashless on the gaming floor; The Star Sydney has moved the bulk of its machines and table games to a card-based cashless system as part of the remediation programme put in place after the 2022 licence finding.

BetStop and what it actually covers

BetStop, the National Self-Exclusion Register, has been live since August 2023. It lets an Australian exclude themselves from every Australian-licensed online and phone wagering service with a single registration. The exclusion is binding on the licensed operator; the operator must close the account, refund any balance and refuse new accounts opened in the excluded name for the duration of the exclusion period.

BetStop does not bind an offshore casino. The register is run by the licensed Australian wagering industry through a scheme administered under the Interactive Gambling Act, and an operator that has no Australian licence and no Australian incorporation has no obligation to honour an Australian self-exclusion. An Australian who excludes themselves through BetStop and then opens an offshore account has excluded themselves from the Australian-licensed market and from that market only. The offshore account is, from the offshore operator’s perspective, a new account in a different jurisdiction.

The helplines that do work from Australia

For the offshore side, the harm-reduction safety net is the National Gambling Helpline on 1800 858 858, free, 24 hours a day, with web chat and email support at Gambling Help Online. Financial counselling is free through the National Debt Helpline on 1800 007 007. Gamblers Anonymous runs face-to-face and online meetings across every Australian state and territory. None of these are casino-specific and none of them are offshore-casino-specific; they are the Australian safety net, and they reach an Australian player regardless of where the player has been playing.

What “wellbeing” means when the venue is offshore

A player using BetStop to exclude themselves from licensed wagering and then continuing to play at an offshore casino has not protected themselves; they have protected themselves from one channel and left themselves open in another. The honest framing, and the one the ACMA’s communications settle on, is that an offshore casino offers no Australian consumer protection: no BetStop coverage, no Australian complaints body, no recourse if the operator refuses a withdrawal, no guarantee the operator will still be in business at the end of the dispute process, and the standing possibility that the URL the player deposited through will be on the next blocking list. This is not a counsel of despair. It is the cost of an offshore account, stated plainly.

A person sitting calmly with a phone open to a support helpline page, no gaming screen visible.
In February 2025 the ACMA issued a formal warning to EOD Code SRL over Instant Casino.

Sydney’s two licensed casino properties

The Star Sydney — Pyrmont, overlooking Darling Harbour

The Star Sydney sits on the northern edge of Darling Harbour in Pyrmont, a few minutes’ walk from the city centre and the harbour’s western shore. It is Australia’s second-largest casino after Crown Melbourne. The property is owned by Star Entertainment Group and runs across two gaming floors, with 351 hotel rooms in the surrounding complex, the 2,000-seat Sydney Lyric theatre and a 3,000-seat Event Centre for conferences and touring shows. The complex runs multiple bars and restaurants — the more casual outlets on the lower gaming floor, the higher-end restaurants and rooftop bars in the upper floors.

The Star Sydney’s licence position is the single most important fact about the venue in 2026. The NSW Independent Casino Commission found The Star Sydney unsuitable to hold its casino licence on 13 September 2022, after an inquiry into conduct relating to money-laundering risks. Star was fined A$100 million in October 2022, and the casino’s licence was suspended and its operations placed under a government-appointed special manager, Nicholas Weeks, with supervision expected to continue through at least September 2025. On 10 February 2025 the Australian Securities and Investments Commission sued members of Star’s former board over the failures to track money-laundering risks. The Star Sydney is operating again; it is operating under supervision.

For a visitor the practical consequence is that the venue is open, the gaming floor is operating, and the entry checks are running tighter than they were before the inquiry. The remediation programme — the cashless card system, the revised compliance procedures, the enhanced reporting to AUSTRAC — is in place. The Star Sydney is a working casino on a working licence under supervision, and that distinction matters to anyone thinking through where they choose to play.

Crown Sydney — Barangaroo, on the harbour edge

Crown Sydney is the 271.3-metre, 75-floor tower at Barangaroo, on the western edge of the Sydney CBD waterfront, and at opening was the tallest building in the city. The building opened to the public in December 2020 with a casino among its hotel and residential floors. The casino occupies the lower levels of the tower; the upper floors are the Crown Towers hotel and the Crown Residences. The Barangaroo address puts it about ten minutes’ walk from the financial district and roughly a kilometre and a half east of The Star Sydney along the harbour foreshore.

Crown Resorts’ licence position in NSW has been steadier than Star’s. The Barangaroo project opened in the aftermath of the 2020 Bergin Commission inquiry in NSW and the parallel 2021 Victorian Royal Commission, both of which found Crown unsuitable to hold casino licences in their respective states. Crown has held its NSW casino licence continuously through the remediation period; the operating licence for the Sydney property is held by Crown Sydney Gaming, a Crown Resorts subsidiary.

For a visitor the practical consequence is similar to The Star Sydney: 18+ entry with photo ID, cashless gaming on the floor, dress code enforced in the premium gaming rooms, and a tighter compliance regime than the industry ran in the late 2010s.

Hotels near both venues

Both properties have on-site hotels. Crown Towers Sydney sits inside the Barangaroo tower above the casino. The Darling at The Star is the on-site hotel at The Star Sydney complex, and the older Astral Tower and Rydges Sydney Central sit within walking distance of the Pyrmont gaming floor. Visitors comparing accommodation usually compare The Darling (5-star, on-site, full access to the casino complex) against the surrounding Pyrmont hotels on price and against Crown Towers (6-star, on-site, Barangaroo) on price and on the harbour view.

The gaming floor at each venue

Tables and table games

Both venues run a full table-game floor. The standard complement is the same: baccarat, blackjack, roulette and, in the premium gaming rooms, craps and pai gow. The Star Sydney’s table floor is larger in raw count — consistent with it being the larger of the two venues — and Crown Sydney’s premium rooms tend to skew higher-stakes. Minimum bets vary by table and by time of day; the public-facing tables usually open with blackjack from around A$25 a hand and roulette from around A$5 inside bets, with baccarat minimums starting in a similar band.

Gaming machine distribution in Australia

Jurisdiction Venues Machines
New South Wales 2,195 87,298
Queensland 351 21,122
South Australia 471 11,672

Live tables, poker and tournaments

Both venues run poker rooms; The Star Sydney’s poker room is one of the larger cash-game poker rooms in the country, with regular tournament series and daily cash games. Crown Sydney’s poker operation is smaller in scale but runs daily cash games and a regular tournament schedule. Both venues run the table-game floor on weekdays and weekends; the premium rooms run on demand and by invitation for higher-stakes play.

What the floor does not include

Neither venue runs an online casino. Neither venue runs online pokies. The question “can I play Sydney’s casino games from my phone” has the same answer it has had since the IGA was strengthened in 2017: no, not legally, and not from either venue.

The offshore operators the ACMA has named

The nature of this list

Eleven brands follow. None of them are recommended. Each of them is on this list because the ACMA published a formal warning identifying the operator and the brand as offering prohibited interactive gambling services to people in Australia. They are the operators the regulator has put a dated, public mark on. The page does not compare their bonuses, because the ACMA’s enforcement record is the only source for any of the offers on these sites and the regulator’s record is the one that matters.

A consistent caveat runs through every brand on this list. Each one displays a non-Australian licence — Curaçao, Anjouan, occasionally the Kahnawake Gaming Commission. None of those licences authorises the operator to take Australian deposits for online casino games; the IGA overrides them, and the ACMA has been telling them so. The “best casino” frame collapses on contact with the prohibition.

RocketPlay

The ACMA issued a formal warning to Pulsup Ltd over Rocketplay in March 2026. The same brand sits inside an earlier warning the ACMA issued to Dama N.V. in May 2022, when Rocketplay was one of six casino brands named in a single warning. Two warnings, four years apart, same operator family on the regulator’s file. An Australian who tried to deposit with Rocketplay and was refused a withdrawal would have an operator with two published ACMA warnings behind it, no Australian presence, and a Curaçao licence that has not, historically, produced outcomes for Australian complainants.

Level Up Casino

The ACMA issued a formal warning to Dama N.V. over Level Up Casino in May 2022, as part of the same six-brand warning that named Bambet, Dazard, Rocketplay, Wild Tornado and Cobra Casinos. Dama N.V. is a Curaçao-incorporated operator that ran a portfolio of casino brands across the same period; the regulator’s published list of Level Up Casino’s inclusion in the warning is the source material. The brand does not have an Australian-facing entity, has not been licensed in any Australian jurisdiction, and operates under a non-Australian regulatory framework the ACMA does not enforce.

Woo Casino

The ACMA issued a further formal warning to Dama N.V. over Woo Casino in March 2025. Woo Casino is the second Dama N.V. brand to attract a fresh warning after the original 2022 batch, which is itself a marker of how the operator responded to the first round. The ACMA’s pattern with Dama N.V. has been escalation: warning, then further warning, then the URL on a blocking request when the conduct does not.

Spirit Casino

The ACMA issued a formal warning to Dama N.V. over Spirit Casino in May 2025. The third Dama N.V. brand to attract a fresh ACMA warning inside twelve months, and the clearest signal in the regulator’s recent file that the operator group has not adjusted its Australian-facing conduct.

National Casino

The ACMA issued a formal warning to Consolutetish S.R.L. over National Casino in July 2025. Consolutetish S.R.L. is a Costa Rica-incorporated entity. National Casino has been on the ACMA’s radar longer than the July 2025 warning suggests — the operator has cycled through entity names and the URL has been the subject of earlier communications — but the July 2025 warning is the current dated entry on the file.

Bizzo Casino

The ACMA issued a formal warning to Consolutetish S.R.L. over Bizzo Casino in July 2025, the same month as the National Casino warning. Bizzo Casino is the older of the two brands in the regulator’s file: it had already attracted a 2022 formal warning to TechSolutions (CY) Group Limited and TechSolutions Group N.V., the previous entities behind the URL. The brand has now cycled through two operator entities and attracted two formal warnings.

Ignition Casino

The ACMA issued a formal warning to Bamboo Media over Ignition Casino in July 2025. Ignition Casino is the brand-name the operator uses for its Australian-facing marketing; the operator behind it has been the subject of communications from the ACMA on the same conduct for several years. The July 2025 warning is the latest dated entry on the regulator’s file.

Instant Casino

The ACMA issued a formal warning to EOD Code SRL over Instant Casino in February 2025. Instant Casino is one of the more aggressive Australian-facing brands in the offshore market, with extensive affiliate marketing and a high volume of deposit-targeted promotions. The ACMA’s February 2025 warning is the regulator’s response to that marketing.

Jackbit

The ACMA issued a formal warning to Ryker B.V. over Jackbit in April 2026, alongside a warning over CasinOK. Ryker B.V. is a Curaçao-incorporated entity running Jackbit as one of its principal brands. The April 2026 warning is the regulator’s most recent formal action against this operator.

Casino Intense

The ACMA issued a formal warning to Sterplay Holding Ltd over Casino Intense in April 2025. Sterplay Holding Ltd is a Curaçao-incorporated entity. Casino Intense has been one of the longer-running brands on the offshore market, with an operator structure that has shifted between jurisdictions over the life of the URL.

Sky Crown

The ACMA issued a formal warning to Hollycorn N.V. over Sky Crown and Blue Leo. Hollycorn N.V. is a Curaçao-incorporated operator with a portfolio of casino brands across the same regulatory footprint. The warning is one of the earlier entries on the regulator’s published list and is the entry the ACMA returns to when the operator group’s conduct does not change.

The “prohibiti” of it: what the list tells the reader

The eleven brands above share a structure. They display a non-Australian licence. They accept deposits from Australian customers using payment methods the Australian-licensed market is banned from accepting (credit cards, crypto). They operate from outside Australia. They have been named by the ACMA in a published formal warning. None of them is offering a service the ACMA regards as legal for Australians to use, and none of them offers an Australian player the protections a licensed venue offers. The cost of using any of them is the cost of being outside the regime — no BetStop coverage, no Australian dispute resolution, no AUSTRAC oversight, no Liquor and Gaming NSW compliance regime, and the standing possibility the URL is on the next blocking list.

A smartphone screen showing a plain government warning notice about a blocked website, held against a blurred background.
In July 2025 the ACMA warned Bamboo Media over Ignition Casino and Consolutetish S.R.L. over National Casino and Bizzo Casino, the latter first warned back in 2022.

Landscape of ACMA-warned operators

Brand ACMA action and date Operator named by the ACMA Subject support
RocketPlay Formal warning, March 2026 (Pulsup Ltd); earlier warning, May 2022 (Dama N.V.) Pulsup Ltd; Dama N.V. —
Level Up Casino Formal warning, May 2022 Dama N.V. Listings-only
Woo Casino Formal warning, March 2025 Dama N.V. —
Spirit Casino Formal warning, May 2025 Dama N.V. —
National Casino Formal warning, July 2025 Consolutetish S.R.L. Listings-only
Bizzo Casino Formal warning, July 2025; earlier warning, 2022 (TechSolutions) Consolutetish S.R.L.; TechSolutions Group N.V. —
Ignition Casino Formal warning, July 2025 Bamboo Media —
Instant Casino Formal warning, February 2025 EOD Code SRL —
Jackbit Formal warning, April 2026 Ryker B.V. —
Casino Intense Formal warning, April 2025 Sterplay Holding Ltd Listings-only
Sky Crown Formal warning, September 2022 Hollycorn N.V. Listings-only

The table is not a comparison of offers. The table is a record of the regulator’s dated public actions, and the dates and operators above are the entries on the ACMA’s own list. What the table does not show is the part a reader cares about most: the unresolved balance, the refused withdrawal, the bonus term that voids winnings on withdrawal. Those are the costs the regulator’s published list does not record.

The blocking rate: how fast the ACMA is removing offshore sites

The numbers that go in

The ACMA’s first blocking request went out in November 2019. By June 2026, 1,751 illegal gambling and affiliate marketing websites had been blocked in total since that first request. The window from November 2019 to June 2026 is roughly six and a half years, or about 78 months.

What the rate looks like over time

1,751 blocked sites across roughly 78 months works out to an average of around 22 blocked sites per month across the lifetime of the regime — and that average hides an acceleration. The early rounds were small, single-digit batches as the ACMA built its legal framework. By 2025-2026 the blocking rounds were running into double digits per round, sometimes with affiliate marketing sites bundled into the same batch as the casino URLs they referred to. The most recent June 2026 round blocked 12 sites in one batch; the rounds before that ran at a similar pace.

What the rate means in practice

The blocking rate is not a measure of how many Australians play at offshore casinos. It is a measure of how fast the regulator’s net is widening. An Australian punter who opens an account at an offshore casino today has, on the regulator’s recent record, a meaningful probability of finding the URL on a blocking list within twelve to eighteen months of opening the account. The exact probability is unknowable in advance; the operator’s track record is the best available predictor, and the operators named in this page are the ones with the worst track records. The cost of an offshore account, expressed in the regulator’s own numbers, is the standing probability the URL the account sits behind will be on the next blocking list, with the balance the punter has not yet withdrawn still on it.

The fundamentals for a visitor choosing between the two venues

What the comparison actually is

The “best casino in Sydney” comparison is, at the practical level, a choice between two licensed venues on Sydney harbour. The Star Sydney is the larger property with the deeper entertainment precinct; Crown Sydney is the newer, taller, more hotel-centric property. The two venues compete for the same visitor dollar and the same corporate-event spend. The Star Sydney’s licence position — operating under a special manager appointed after the 2022 licence finding — is the most significant non-gaming fact about the venue, and it is the fact a visitor should weight most heavily when choosing between the two.

When The Star Sydney is the right answer

The Star Sydney is the right answer for a visitor who wants the full entertainment precinct — multiple restaurants, multiple bars, the Sydney Lyric theatre, the Event Centre, the larger poker floor, and the larger gaming floor. The Star is also the right answer for a visitor who wants to see, in the operational changes inside the venue, what the NSW Independent Casino Commission’s remediation programme looks like in practice. The Star Sydney is operating under supervision, and the supervision has visibly changed the venue.

When Crown Sydney is the right answer

Crown Sydney is the right answer for a visitor who wants the hotel-first experience, the harbour view from the upper floors of the tower, and a smaller, more concentrated casino floor. Crown Sydney’s gaming floor is more focused than The Star’s, the premium rooms are more centralised, and the building itself is the experience for visitors who would otherwise stay in the city. Crown Sydney’s licence position has been steadier than The Star’s through the 2020-2025 remediation period.

The cost both venues charge a visitor

The cost both venues charge is the same cost any licensed casino charges: the house edge on every spin and every hand. Baccarat’s house edge sits at the bottom of the table, around 1.06 per cent on the banker bet; blackjack’s house edge sits below 1 per cent on a well-played basic strategy hand; American roulette’s house edge is the highest of the standard games at 5.26 per cent. None of these numbers is a secret; all of them are on the venue’s printed material. The cost the visitor can avoid is the cost of an offshore casino that displays a non-Australian licence and accepts credit cards. That cost is not avoided by choosing the venue carefully; it is avoided by choosing not to play there at all.

FAQ

What is the name of the main casino in Sydney?

Sydney has two licensed casinos: The Star Sydney in Pyrmont and Crown Sydney at Barangaroo. The Star Sydney is the larger of the two by gaming-floor size and is the longer-established of the two, having operated on the Darling Harbour site since 1995. Crown Sydney is the newer of the two, opening inside the Barangaroo tower in December 2020. Neither venue runs an online casino.

Where is the casino in Sydney located?

The Star Sydney sits on the northern edge of Darling Harbour in Pyrmont, a short walk from the Sydney CBD across the Pyrmont Bridge. Crown Sydney is the 271.3-metre tower at Barangaroo, on the western edge of the CBD waterfront about a kilometre and a half east of The Star Sydney along the harbour foreshore. Both are on the harbour’s western shore within ten minutes’ walk of each other.

What is the minimum age to enter the casino in Sydney?

The minimum age is 18, the same as the broader gambling age across New South Wales. Entry is enforced at the door with photo identification — a current driver’s licence, a current passport or a NSW Photo Card. Both venues run the entrant against the NSW casino exclusion register as part of the entry check.

Does the casino in Sydney offer table games such as blackjack and baccarat?

Both venues run full table-game floors with baccarat, blackjack and roulette as the standard complement, plus craps and pai gow in the premium gaming rooms. The Star Sydney runs the larger of the two table floors in raw count; Crown Sydney’s premium rooms skew higher-stakes. Neither venue’s table games are available online.

Are there hotels within walking distance of the casino in Sydney?

Both venues have on-site hotels: The Darling at The Star Sydney and Crown Towers at Barangaroo. The older Astral Tower and Rydges Sydney Central sit within walking distance of The Star Sydney in Pyrmont. The surrounding CBD hotels are within walking distance of Crown Sydney at Barangaroo, and the harbourside hotels further east are a short cab ride from either venue.

Can Australians legally play at an online casino instead of visiting the casino in Sydney?

No. The Interactive Gambling Act 2001, as strengthened by the Interactive Gambling Amendment Act 2017, prohibits the supply of online casino games, online pokies and in-play betting to a person in Australia. No state or territory issues a licence for online casino games. The ACMA enforces the prohibition through formal warnings and blocking requests against offshore operators; 1,751 illegal gambling and affiliate marketing sites had been blocked by June 2026 since the first blocking request in November 2019. An offshore casino offers no Australian consumer protection, no BetStop coverage and no Australian dispute resolution.